@inbook {aiken_listening_2024,
	title = {Listening for Diverse Signals From Emergent and Submarine Volcanoes},
	booktitle = {Noisy Oceans},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Section: 4 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781119750925.ch4},
	pages = {43{\textendash}58},
	publisher = {American Geophysical Union (AGU)},
	organization = {American Geophysical Union (AGU)},
	abstract = {Underwater volcanoes produce seismic, tsunami, and volcanic hazards. Yet our first clues regarding underwater volcanism are often limited to observations from satellite imagery or regional seismic networks because of infrequent marine surveys and a limited number of seafloor observatories. On regional networks, large explosions and eruptions can be observed as well as volcanic tremor and magnitude >3 volcano-tectonic earthquakes and very-long-period events, albeit with limited resolution. However, at long distances, other types of signals such as long-period events, explosive-type signals, and landslides may go undetected. Thus there is a need to monitor underwater volcanism locally, to increase observations and enhance their quality and, consequently, sharpen our view of underwater volcanic processes. At present, local deployments of hydrophones and seismometers are rare for underwater volcanoes, perhaps because they seldom present a risk to communities. However, in the future, underwater volcano monitoring may shift toward using existing telecommunication cables. In this chapter, underwater volcano signals are discussed: how they are recorded, detected, monitored, and distinguished in underwater data in the context of known subaerial and submarine volcanism. Examples of known and monitored underwater volcanism are presented as well as economical and environment-friendly real-time submarine volcano monitoring options for the future.},
	keywords = {monitoring, submarine volcanoes, volcano seismology, volcano signals},
	isbn = {978-1-119-75092-5},
	doi = {10.1002/9781119750925.ch4},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119750925.ch4},
	author = {Aiken, Chastity}
}
@article {apprill_toward_2023,
	title = {Toward a New Era of Coral Reef Monitoring.},
	journal = {Environmental science \& technology},
	volume = {57},
	year = {2023},
	note = {Place: United States},
	month = {mar},
	pages = {5117-5124},
	abstract = {Coral reefs host some of the highest concentrations of biodiversity and economic value in the oceans, yet these ecosystems are under threat due to climate change and other human impacts. Reef monitoring is routinely used to help prioritize reefs for conservation and evaluate the success of intervention efforts. Reef status and health are most frequently characterized using diver-based surveys, but the inherent limitations of these methods mean there is a growing need for advanced, standardized, and automated reef techniques that capture the complex nature of the ecosystem. Here we draw on experiences from our own interdisciplinary research programs to describe advances in in situ diver-based and autonomous reef monitoring. We present our vision for integrating interdisciplinary measurements for select "case-study" reefs worldwide and for learning patterns within the biological, physical, and chemical reef components and their interactions. Ultimately, these efforts could support the development of a scalable and standardized suite of sensors that capture and relay key data to assist in categorizing reef health. This framework has the potential to provide stakeholders with the information necessary to assess reef health during an unprecedented time of reef change as well as restoration and intervention activities.},
	keywords = {autonomous, coral reef, interdisciplinary, monitoring, sensor, technology},
	issn = {1520-5851 0013-936X},
	doi = {10.1021/acs.est.2c05369},
	author = {Apprill, Amy and Girdhar, Yogesh and Mooney, T. Aran and Hansel, Colleen M. and Long, Matthew H. and Liu, Yaqin and Zhang, W. Gordon and Kapit, Jason and Hughen, Konrad and Coogan, Jeff and Greene, Austin}
}
@article {fluegel_magnetization_2022,
	title = {The Magnetization of an Underwater Caldera: A Time-Lapse Magnetic Anomaly Study of Axial Seamount},
	journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
	volume = {49},
	number = {17},
	year = {2022},
	note = {_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2022GL100008},
	pages = {e2022GL100008},
	abstract = {Axial Seamount in the northeast Pacific erupted in 2015, 2011, and 1998. Although monitored by the Regional Cabled Array of the Ocean Observatory Initiative, few magnetic surveys have been conducted over the region. This study uses high-resolution magnetic data over the seamount collected by autonomous underwater vehicle Sentry during three years (2015, 2017, and 2020). The goal is to investigate whether there are temporal changes in the near-surface magnetic field observable over the time scale of one volcanic cycle. We compare magnetic maps from repeated tracklines from each year. We find maps of the yearly difference in magnetization show coherent patterns that are not random. The central region of the caldera has become more magnetic during recent years, suggesting cooling of the surficial lava flows since 2015. Sentry data are more sensitive to shallow crustal structure compared to sea surface data which show longer wavelength anomalies extending deeper into the crust.},
	keywords = {magnetism, monitoring, seamounts, volcanic hazards, volcanology},
	issn = {1944-8007},
	doi = {10.1029/2022GL100008},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022GL100008},
	author = {Fluegel, Bailey and Tivey, Maurice and Biasi, Joseph and Chadwick Jr., William W. and Nooner, Scott L.}
}
@article {biasi_volcano_2022,
	title = {Volcano Monitoring With Magnetic Measurements: A Simulation of Eruptions at Axial Seamount, Kilauea, B{\'a}r{\dh}arbunga, and Mount Saint Helens},
	journal = {Geophysical Research Letters},
	volume = {49},
	number = {17},
	year = {2022},
	note = {_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2022GL100006},
	pages = {e2022GL100006},
	abstract = {Monitoring of active volcanic systems is a challenging task due in part to the trade-offs between collection of high-quality data from multiple techniques and the high costs of acquiring such data. Here we show that magnetic data can be used to monitor volcanoes by producing similar data to gravimetric techniques at significantly lower cost. The premise of this technique is that magma and wall rock above the Curie temperature are magnetically {\textquotedblleft}transparent,{\textquotedblright} but not stationary within the crust. Subsurface movements of magma can affect the crustal magnetic field measured at the surface. We construct highly simplified magnetic models of four volcanic systems: Mount Saint Helens (1980), Axial Seamount (2015{\textendash}2020), Kilauea (2018), and B{\'a}r{\dh}arbunga (2014). In all cases, observed or inferred changes to the magmatic system would have been detectable by modern magnetometers. Magnetic monitoring could become common practice at many volcanoes, particularly in developing nations with high volcanic risk.},
	keywords = {Hawaii, Iceland, magnetism, monitoring, volcanic hazards, volcanology},
	issn = {1944-8007},
	doi = {10.1029/2022GL100006},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022GL100006},
	author = {Biasi, Joseph and Tivey, Maurice and Fluegel, Bailey}
}
@article {RN206,
	title = {The Importance of Marine Research Infrastructures in Capturing Processes and Impacts of Extreme Events},
	journal = {Frontiers in Marine Science},
	volume = {08},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {626668},
	type = {Journal Article},
	abstract = {Extreme events have long been underestimated in the extent to which they shape the surface of our planet, our environment, its ecological integrity, and the sustainability of human society. Extreme events are by definition rarely observed, of significant impact and, as a result of their spatiotemporal range, not always easily predicted. Extremes may be short-term catastrophic events such as tsunamis, or long-term evolving events such as those linked to climate change; both modify the environment, producing irreversible changes or regime shifts. Whatever the driver that triggers the extreme event, the damages are often due to a combination of several processes and their impacts can affect large areas with secondary events (domino effect), whose effects in turn may persist well beyond the duration of the trigger event itself. Early studies of extreme events were limited to opportunistic approaches: observations were made within the context of naturally occurring events with high societal impact. Given that climate change is now moving us out of a relatively static climate regime during the development of human civilization, extreme events are now a function of underlying climate shifts overlain by catastrophic processes. Their impacts are often due to synergistic factors, all relevant in understanding process dynamics; therefore, an integrated methodology has become essential to enhance the reliability of new assessments and to develop strategies to mitigate societal impacts. Here we summarize the current state of extreme event monitoring in the marine system, highlighting the advantages of a multidisciplinary approach using Research Infrastructures for providing the temporal and spatial resolution required to monitor Earth processes and enhance assessment of associated impacts.},
	keywords = {international cooperation, interoperability, marine extreme events, monitoring, multidisciplinary, research infrastructures},
	doi = {10.3389/fmars.2021.626668},
	url = {https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1136473721 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.626668/pdf},
	author = {Bue, Nadia Lo and Best, Mairi M. R. and Embriaco, Davide and Abeysirigunawardena, Dilumie and Beranzoli, Laura and Dewey, Richard K. and Favali, Paolo and Feng, Ming and Heesemann, Martin and Leijala, Ulpu and {\'O}{\textquoteright}Conchubhair, Diarmuid and Scherwath, Martin and Scoccimarro, Enrico and Wernberg, Thomas}
}
@article {RN172,
	title = {Obsea: A Decadal Balance for a Cabled Observatory Deployment},
	journal = {IEEE Access},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {33163-33177},
	type = {Journal Article},
	abstract = {The study of the effects of climate change on the marine environment requires the existence of sufficiently long time series of key parameters. The study of these series allows both to characterize the range of variability in each particular region and to detect trends or changes that could be attributed to anthropogenic causes. For this reason, networks of permanent cabled observation systems are being deployed in the ocean. This paper presents a balance of a decade of activity at the OBSEA cabled observatory, as an example of ocean monitoring success and drawbacks. It is not the objective of this article to analyze the scientific and technical aspects already presented by the authors in different publications (Table 4). We will evaluate the overall experience by retracing the different steps of infrastructure deployment and maintenance, focusing on routines for in situ control, damages experienced, breakdowns and administrative constraints by local administrations. We will conclude by providing a set of guidelines to improve cabled observatories scientific outreach, societal projection, and economic efficiency. As a result of this work, a 10-years dataset has been published in Pangaea that is available for the community.},
	keywords = {Europe, Instruments, monitoring, Observatories, Oceans, Sea measurements, Underwater cables},
	doi = {10.1109/access.2020.2973771},
	url = {https://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1125026314 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielx7/6287639/8948470/08998177.pdf},
	author = {Del-Rio, Joaquin and Nogueras, Marc and Toma, Daniel Mihai and Mart{\'\i}nez, Enoc and Artero-Delgado, Carola and Bghiel, Ikram and Martinez, Marc and Cadena, Javier and Garcia-Benadi, Albert and Sarria, David and Aguzzi, Jacopo and Masmitja, Ivan and Carandell, Matias and Olive, Joaquim and Gomariz, Spartacus and Santamaria, Pep and L{\`a}zaro, Antoni M{\`a}nuel}
}
