@article {palevsky_model_2024,
	title = {A model for community-driven development of best practices: the Ocean Observatories Initiative Biogeochemical Sensor Data Best Practices and User Guide},
	journal = {Frontiers in Marine Science},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Frontiers},
	month = {apr},
	abstract = {The field of oceanography is transitioning from data-poor to data-rich, thanks in part to increased deployment of in-situ platforms and sensors, such as those that instrument the US-funded Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI). However, generating science-ready data products from these sensors, particularly those making biogeochemical measurements, often requires extensive end-user calibration and validation procedures, which can present a significant barrier. Openly available community-developed and -vetted Best Practices contribute to overcoming such barriers, but collaboratively developing user-friendly Best Practices can be challenging. Here we describe the process undertaken by the NSF-funded OOI Biogeochemical Sensor Data Working Group to develop Best Practices for creating science-ready biogeochemical data products from OOI data, culminating in the publication of the GOOS-endorsed OOI Biogeochemical Sensor Data Best Practices and User Guide. For Best Practices related to ocean observatories, engaging observatory staff is crucial, but having a {\textquotedblleft}user-defined{\textquotedblright} process ensures the final product addresses user needs. Our process prioritized bringing together a diverse team and creating an inclusive environment where all participants could effectively contribute. Incorporating the perspectives of a wide range of experts and prospective end users through an iterative review process that included {\textquotedblleft}Beta Testers{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} enabled us to produce a final product that combines technical information with a user-friendly structure that illustrates data analysis pipelines via flowcharts and worked examples accompanied by pseudo-code. Our process and its impact on improving the accessibility and utility of the end product provides a roadmap for other groups undertaking similar community-driven activities to develop and disseminate new Ocean Best Practices.},
	keywords = {beta testers, biogeochemical sensors, ocean best practices, Ocean Observatories Initiative, Working group},
	issn = {2296-7745},
	doi = {10.3389/fmars.2024.1358591},
	url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1358591},
	author = {Palevsky, Hilary I. and Clayton, Sophie and Benway, Heather and Maheigan, Mairead and Atamanchuk, Dariia and Battisti, Roman and Batryn, Jennifer and Bourbonnais, Annie and Briggs, Ellen M. and Carvalho, Filipa and Chase, Alison P. and Eveleth, Rachel and Fatland, Rob and Fogaren, Kristen E. and Fram, Jonathan Peter and Hartman, Susan E. and Le Bras, Isabela and Manning, Cara C. M. and Needoba, Joseph A. and Neely, Merrie Beth and Oliver, Hilde and Reed, Andrew C. and Rheuban, Jennie E. and Schallenberg, Christina and Walsh, Ian and Wingard, Christopher and Bauer, Kohen and Chen, Baoshan and Cuevas, Jose and Flecha, Susana and Horwith, Micah and Melendez, Melissa and Menz, Tyler and Rivero-Calle, Sara and Roden, Nicholas P. and Steinhoff, Tobias and Trucco-Pignata, Pablo Nicol{\'a}s and Vardaro, Michael F. and Yoder, Meg}
}
@article {rudzin_catalyzing_2022,
	title = {Catalyzing Remote Collaboration During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Early Career Oceanographers Adopt Hybrid Open Science Framework},
	journal = {Frontiers in Marine Science},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2022},
	month = {jan},
	abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic introduced many challenges for research scientists: reduction of lab and field observation collection and in-person meetings. These new constraints forced researchers to remote work and virtual networking, dramatically influencing scientific inquiry. Such challenges are compounded for those in early stages of their career, where data collection and networking are vital to be seen as productive. However, during this trying time of remote work, we, as a collective of early-career oceanographers, were actively developing and improving on an already-existent hybrid community of practice. Through our experiences, we believe this type of framework can enhance virtual collaboration to the point that it outlasts the pandemic and helps create new synergies that will diversify and enhance scientific inquiry within the ocean science community. We describe a hybrid community of practice and an example workflow that models effective collaboration. We have found that three components to this model are necessary for effective collaboration, inspiration, and communication: 1) openly accessible data, 2) software, computational, and professional-development resources, and 3) a team science approach. In our experience, both the in-person and remote aspects of the model are important. In person collaboration is key to expanding the community of practice and invigorating those already within the community. Remote collaboration has been critical for effective collaborations between in-person activities and has proven to maximize outputs during in-person collaborations. While the three components of this model are not new to the scientific community, we believe that utilizing them strategically post-pandemic will diversify and expand scientific collaboration in oceanography.},
	doi = {10.3389/fmars.2022.855192},
	url = {https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_fac_pubs/441},
	author = {Rudzin, Johna and Soule, Dax and Whitaker, Justine and Berger, Halle and Clayton, Sophie and Fogaren, Kristen}
}
@article {RN103,
	title = {Global Perspectives on Observing Ocean Boundary Current Systems},
	journal = {Frontiers in Marine Science},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {423},
	type = {Journal Article},
	abstract = {Ocean boundary current systems are key components of the climate system, are home to highly productive ecosystems, and have numerous societal impacts. Establishment of a global network of boundary current observing systems is a critical part of ongoing development of the Global Ocean Observing System. The characteristics of boundary current systems are reviewed, focusing on scientific and societal motivations for sustained observing. Techniques currently used to observe boundary current systems are reviewed, followed by a census of the current state of boundary current observing systems globally. The next steps in the development of boundary current observing systems are considered, leading to several specific recommendations.},
	keywords = {autonomous underwater gliders, drifters, eastern boundary current systems, moorings, ocean observing systems, remote sensing, time series, western boundary current systems},
	issn = {2296-7745},
	doi = {10.3389/fmars.2019.00423},
	url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2019.00423},
	author = {Todd, Robert E. and Chavez, Francisco P. and Clayton, Sophie and Cravatte, Sophie and Goes, Marlos and Graco, Michelle and Lin, Xiaopei and Sprintall, Janet and Zilberman, Nathalie V. and Archer, Matthew and Ar{\'\i}stegui, Javier and Balmaseda, Magdalena and Bane, John M. and Baringer, Molly O. and Barth, John A. and Beal, Lisa M. and Brandt, Peter and Calil, Paulo H. R. and Campos, Edmo and Centurioni, Luca R. and Chidichimo, Maria Paz and Cirano, Mauro and Cronin, Meghan F. and Curchitser, Enrique N. and Davis, Russ E. and Dengler, Marcus and deYoung, Brad and Dong, Shenfu and Escribano, Ruben and Fassbender, Andrea J. and Fawcett, Sarah E. and Feng, Ming and Goni, Gustavo J. and Gray, Alison R. and Guti{\'e}rrez, Dimitri and Hebert, Dave and Hummels, Rebecca and Ito, Shin-ichi and Krug, Marjorlaine and Lacan, Fran{\c c}ois and Laurindo, Lucas and Lazar, Alban and Lee, Craig M. and Lengaigne, Matthieu and Levine, Naomi M. and Middleton, John and Montes, Ivonne and Muglia, Mike and Nagai, Takeyoshi and Palevsky, Hilary I. and Palter, Jaime B. and Phillips, Helen E. and Piola, Alberto and Plueddemann, Albert J. and Qiu, Bo and Rodrigues, Regina R. and Roughan, Moninya and Rudnick, Daniel L. and Rykaczewski, Ryan R. and Saraceno, Martin and Seim, Harvey and Gupta, Alex Sen and Shannon, Lynne and Sloyan, Bernadette M. and Sutton, Adrienne J. and Thompson, LuAnne and Plas, Anja K. van der and Volkov, Denis and Wilkin, John and Zhang, Dongxiao and Zhang, Linlin}
}
